I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that the theory of syntactic features developed earlier appears to correlate rather closely with the strong generative capacity of the theory. Presumably, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial raises serious doubts about problems of phonemic and morphological analysis. We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis: a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the paired utterance test. To characterize a linguistic level L, the earlier discussion of deviance is necessary to impose an interpretation on a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar. For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition suffices to account for nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory.
see also: WikiPedia -- Chomskybot